<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Better Roads &#187; bridges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betterroads.com/tag/bridges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betterroads.com</link>
	<description>Better Roads Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrating 80 Years of Better Roads</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/celebrating-80-years-of-better-roads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/celebrating-80-years-of-better-roads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[80th Anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.K. Olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alden F. Perrin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Road Builders Association (A.R.B.A.)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asphaltic road oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asphaltic surface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Equipment Manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bass Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bergman Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Public Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.M. Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commucar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONEXPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONEXPO-CONAGG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry Manufacturers Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eisenhower Interstate Highway System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elvis Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal gas tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal-Aid Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerald C. Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerald Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Francis Sargent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Gifford Pinchot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravel roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry McGregor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highway Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennings Randolph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Benson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Volpe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linkbelt Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M.B. Hodges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor gtravel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Economic Crossroads Transportation Efficiency Act (NEXTEA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota State Highway Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Motor Vehicle Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-mixed surface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paved roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Works Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA-LU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Committee on Public Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sinclair Weeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southwest Road Show and School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley E. Boie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starke County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state and federal highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-wide numbering system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Department of Highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Highway Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treated lumber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpaved roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William F. Steuber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winneshiek County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterroads.com/?p=16841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.betterroads.com/celebrating-80-years-of-better-roads/'><img src='http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/br10-31cvr-216x300.jpg' class='imgtfe' width='70' alt='Image with no title' /></a><a href='http://www.betterroads.com/celebrating-80-years-of-better-roads/'><img src='http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/br10-31cvr-216x300.jpg' class='imgtfe' width=100 alt='Image with no title' /></a><img src='http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/br10-31cvr-216x300.jpg' class='imgtfe' width=170 alt='Image with no title' />From the mostly gravel roads that existed when the magazine was founded to today’s super highways, there has been extensive development, technology and building of local roads, state and federal highways and bridges during this time. Perhaps we can find a way to learn from the past.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="font-size: large">Better Roads</span></strong></p>
<p>The October 2011 issue, Better Roads marked the 80th anniversary of the magazine. The publication was founded in 1931 by Alden F. Perrin, who served a publisher and editorial director until his death in 1965.</p>
<p>From the mostly gravel roads that existed when the magazine was founded to today’s super highways, there has been extensive development, technology and building of local roads, state and federal highways and bridges during this time.</p>
<p>Perhaps we can find a way to learn from the past.</p>
<p>The following articles are from the first issue of Better Roads in October, 1931 and others throughout the decade of the 1930s through 2011.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small"> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The 1930s</span></strong></p>
<p>Excerpts from issues of Better Roads throughout the 1930s</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Some things never change</span></strong></p>
<p>“Readers, who do not have to be reminded that the problem of financing for rebuilding continues in and out of depression (re: The Great Depression), may be expected to show some interest in a suggestion for permanent federal aid for county and township roads.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/br10-31cvr.jpg"  rel="shadowbox[post-16841];player=img;"><span style="font-size: small"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-16853" src="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/br10-31cvr-216x300.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="300" /></span></a><span style="font-size: small">We’ve come a long way, baby</span></strong><span style="font-size: small">!</span></p>
<p>“Of the 300,000-mile system of state highways, a total of approximately 200,000 miles is now surfaced. Of the remaining 2,700,000 miles of rural roads, little over 15 percent is out of the earth-surface class.”</p>
<p>Note: Today, there are 4 million miles of roads in the United States with 2.5 million paved roads….1.5 million miles of roads remain unpaved.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/streetrods.jpg"  rel="shadowbox[post-16841];player=img;"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-16854" src="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/streetrods.jpg" alt="" width="190" height="158" /></a><span style="font-size: small">“Gee, our old LaSalle ran great”</span></strong></p>
<p>“Here indeed is food for thought. The development of luxurious motor vehicles has its counterpart in the development of safer and more pleasant and comfortable roads. With touring no longer a novelty, the highway user has acquired a concern what may be called the amenities of motor travel.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The visionary governor</span></strong></p>
<p>Regarding his state’s farm-road program, one of the first in the United States at the time, Pennsylvania Gov. Gifford Pinchot wrote in a 1931 issue of Better Roads, “…the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania took over 20,000 miles of rural roads –the farmer’s roads to build them and maintain them at state expense. This means not only that farmers on this mileage will be lifted by the mud, but the yearly $10,000,000 will be lifted from the backs of the farmer taxpayers of Pennsylvania.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Ohio Motor Vehicle Act</span></strong></p>
<p>“A change in the system of taxing motor vehicles and in the distribution of such tax funds will provide additional highway funds for Ohio counties. The new measure exempts motor vehicles from personal property taxation and increases the cost of license tags.”—Editorial comment by Alden F. Perrin, publisher and editorial director, Better Roads, Nov. 1931.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Building low-cost roads in Iowa</span></strong></p>
<p>“Winneshiek County finds heavier equipment necessary to carry out new duties imposed by the Bergman Law (this law gave control of all township roads, formerly in the care of township trustees, to title boards of supervisors and engineers); small dragline shovel combination proved ideal unit.” The dragline was a Speeder ½-yard unit. Speeder is the predecessor to the Linkbelt Company.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Bargain prices prevail in North Dakota</span></strong></p>
<p>“At the July 31 letting, contracts for gravel hauling at 6-1/2 cents per yard-mile and earth excavating at 15 cents per cubic yard were awarded.” &#8211;North Dakota State Highway Department</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Plans for Wichita Road Show</span></strong></p>
<p>“Plans are being completed for the seventh annual Southwest Road Show and School, to be held at Wichita, Kan. on Feb. 23, 24, 25 and 26, 1932. Lectures on road construction and maintenance will be delivered by some of the ablest authorities in the country.”—article appearing in Better Roads, Dec. 1931.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Economy of treated timber</span></strong></p>
<p>“Modern highway bridges constructed of treated timber should not be confused with or compared to the timber bridge of a generation past, any more than other present types should be compared to their predecessors.”—article appearing in Better Roads, Jan. 1932.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">State-wide numbering system</span></strong></p>
<p>“The numbering and marking of county roads in Kansas will soon be complete throughout the state through the cooperative efforts of Kansas counties.” &#8212; article appearing in Better Roads, Feb. 1932.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Oil-mixed surface applied on Indiana road</span></strong></p>
<p>“Mixed-in-place construction employing asphaltic road oil and local gravel as aggregate was used this summer to surfacing approximately five miles of the county road around Bass Lake in Starke County, Ind. The smooth, dustless completed surface has met with the complete approval of road users and dwellers in the vicinity.”—article appearing in Better Roads, March 1932.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Mr. A.K. Olsen, County Engineers report: Union County, Iowa</span></strong></p>
<p>“Here are two statements bearing on the essential tools of road building—that can be pondered with profit by many county engineers”:</p>
<p>· “Motorized maintenance equipment is proving itself a money-saver in every way.”</p>
<p>· “Efficiency and economy cannot be achieved without an organization of experienced men.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Preparing for winter</span></strong></p>
<p>“Year by year the picture changes; annually there is recorded a greater mileage of roads open to traffic the year around. In truth, the cleared highway is a necessity and no longer a luxury.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Organizing a New York county for snow removal</span></strong></p>
<p>As a result of its geographical situation, Chautauqua County, N.Y. is subject to intense local snowstorms… (which) has necessitated the organization of an elaborate system of dispatching plowing equipment. Trucks and snowplows, the drivers of which can be reached at anytime by telephone, are stationed and held at strategic points….</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small"> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The 1940s</span></strong></p>
<p>The World War II era was a time when money for roads was scarce and uncertainty plentiful. Yet the need for mobilization and the anticipation of the end to the war when the country would boom made for a dilemma for government agencies and planners of the time.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">January 1942—Less than 30 days after the United States enters World War II</span></strong></p>
<p>When the January 1942 issue of Better Roads was published, the United States had just entered the war following the attack on Pearl Harbor less than a month earlier. Imagine the world then without CNN, the Internet and networks of instant communications!</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">From the editorial “Local Government in Wartime”</span></strong></p>
<p>In his first editorial comment following the beginning of U.S. involvement in the war, in the January 1942 issue, less than a month after Pearl Harbor, Better Roads Editor C.M. Nelson wrote:</p>
<p>“In the new world we are getting adjusted to many readers of this magazine must be asking themselves questions…’ How will local governments come out of the war? Will they be stronger or weaker’? ‘Will citizens find their local governments more essential or less essential to the processes of American democracy?’”—Better Roads editor, C.M.Nelson</p>
<p>“In these days, like individuals, they (local governments) must toughen themselves to meet the shocks.”—Better Roads editor, C.M. Nelson</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Girding for War…. Planning for peace</span></strong>.</p>
<p>The feature article in January 1942 was previewed this way:</p>
<p>“While girding for war, America is planning for peace. A post-war planning agency with which road officials will have close relations is Public Works Reserve.” The head of this agency was A.D. Morrell, who outlined the agency’s “aims and proposed procedures” in the January 1942 issue.</p>
<p>Morrell wrote, “In a sense the establishment of the Public Works Reserve is recognition of our need to prepare for peace. As an agency interested in public work, the Public Works Reserve has two express purposes. One is to secure from all state and local governmental agencies a listing of work that they consider necessary to the public good for the next five or six years. The second purpose is to assist these governmental agencies in the development and maintenance of a long-range program for such work.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Planning for the times</span></strong></p>
<p>In a February 1942 editorial on highway priorities for the U.S. during wartime, Editor Nelson wrote…</p>
<p>“The new master plan for highways for the war period will be worked out section by section, and month by month. Major uncertainties will remain. But highway planning for the war will never get started until we are satisfied that we know for certain what work cannot under any circumstances be curtailed, what can be reduced or delayed, and what can be forgotten for the time being.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Road builders face the war</span></strong></p>
<p>In a report from the annual American Road Builders Association (A.R.B.A.) (now the American Road &amp; Transportation Builders Association, more commonly known as ARTBA) in February 1942, Better Roads reports that the leading road builder’s group was told by government officials that “only the most urgent road construction is possible…” yet, “serviceable highways are a vital war necessity.” The A.R.B.A. members were told, “Many roads are breaking up under the increased tonnages resulting form the speeding-up of war industry.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Wartime restrictions on motor-vehicle use</span></strong></p>
<p>“Because of war regulations, it appears that for a long-time to come the number of new cars and other motor equipment will be extremely limited.</p>
<p>This means diminishing traffic and dwindling tax returns for highway users”, which “will result in loss of income derived by the states from sales and highway-user levies.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">What about the roads?</span></strong></p>
<p>In an editorial titled “What about the Roads” appearing in the June 1942 issue six months after the U.S. entered the war, Better Roads opined:</p>
<p>“At what level can the operations of highway departments be carried on without risking irreparable damage to the roads and to the vehicles using them in performing essential tasks? We are pretty well convinced that the vehicles and the tires we have aren’t going to last forever. What about the roads?”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Motor traffic and war industry: Facing the rubber shortage</span></strong></p>
<p>As the war effort was now in high gear in June 1942 shortages of rubber, gasoline and other products needed to build and maintain roads were evident. In a transportation survey conducted by the state of West Virginia, it was reported that…</p>
<p>“Nearly 65 percent of all employees now travel to and from work in private automobiles on which 48 percent of the tires will be worn out in the next six months.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Those post-war plans</span></strong></p>
<p>Two and a half years after the start of the war, roadbuilders looked with optimism to the end of the war, as reported in the June 1943 issue&#8230;</p>
<p>“The prevailing tone of the planning sessions of the American Roads Builders Association held in Chicago last month was one of unity and accord. The roadbuilders aren’t in total agreement on the desirable size of the post war highway program, but they are agreed on where the decimal point should be. It will be a whopping big program, they believe, and road leaders in congress appear to think so too.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">A wartime shop safety check-list</span></strong></p>
<p>In an article about shop safety during wartime appearing in the July 1943 issues, editors provide a list of “rules” for shop safety …</p>
<p>“The war compels a special vigilance. War news, possibly striking close to home, is certain to distract workers’ attention from what they are doing. These rules will aid safety education of new workers in the highway shop, and in reminding more experienced men that the chances of being laid up as the outcome of an accident is as good as ever.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">January 1944 issue—the glitch in post-war planning</span></strong></p>
<p>“Failure of highway organizations to develop plans for projects that will be all ready to go at the end of the war isn’t always an indication of indifference or pure procrastination of caution amid uncertainties, including uncertainty about what the federal government is going to do. Often the only reason why preparation of plans is far behind schedule is that the technical manpower needed for the work simply isn’t available.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Attitude of survival</span></strong></p>
<p>In an article on the condition of U.S. road maintenance during the war period, M.B. Hodges, Maintenance Engineer, Texas Highway Department wrote in the January 1944 issue, “As we enter the year 1944, we look forward with some optimism—and yet there are no real grounds for such an outlook. Conditions could not be much worse than they have been, and they should be much better. Maintenance demands go on in war years as in peace years, regardless of wartime strains on basic resources. We are going to have to work and work as we never have in years gone by.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Preparing for the influx of veterans to return home—from the March 1945 issue</span></strong></p>
<p>“We have made ready for our veterans’ homecoming. The boys who come back from the war will not be the same boys who went away. Tact and patience on the part of fellow-employees will help smooth their way.”</p>
<p>“Warren County Mich. is prepared to fit its returning servicemen into civilian life through the means of a liberal, sympathetic veteran policy. Men who have neuro-psychiatric difficulties need special attention.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">On the manpower shortage…from the April 1944 issue…weeks before V-E (Victory Europe) Day</span></strong></p>
<p>“How are we going to get post-war projects into the blueprint stage? What will we use for engineers and draftsmen? The shortage of technical manpower has raised these perplexing questions for highway departments in every part of the country.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The Post-war Era is here</span></strong></p>
<p>In an editorial title “The Post-war Era is Here,” Editor C.M. Nelson penned the following editorial in the September 1945 issue just a few weeks after V-J (Victory Japan) Day:</p>
<p>“We are living in the post-war era. Are we ready for it? If peace finds the nation unprepared, it isn’t because we haven’t been warned. We shall soon have a chance to find out how much more security there is in forthright plans than in illusions of an automatic and assured transition to a normal and comfortable peacetime world. The end of the war brings new responsibilities and the opportunity to carry on with unfinished highway business.”</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small"> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The 1950s</span></strong></p>
<p>America celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Interstate System in 2006. The decade of the 1950s was, perhaps, the most important in the history of highway and bridge construction the United States with the building of the “Eisenhower Interstate Highway System.”</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/DwightEisenhower.jpg"  rel="shadowbox[post-16841];player=img;"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-16856" src="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/DwightEisenhower.jpg" alt="" width="151" height="217" /></a>The decade of the 1950s, and the period after 1956 and into the mid-1960s, was most prolific. With the post-WWII economic and population boom in full swing, and with the notion of an interstate system in mind, President Dwight D. Eisenhower set the wheels in motion for the most extensive road construction program ever attempted.</p>
<p>Although a national highway “system” was established in 1944, it was not until 1952 that it was specifically allocated funds, and then only a token $25 million. This amount was upped to $175 million in 1954 not nearly adequate enough to fund a true national road network.</p>
<p>Eisenhower’s vision of a national network of highways stems from two personal experiences. Through a cross-country military convoy in 1919 from Washington, D.C. to San Francisco over dirt roads and un-bridged streams, young Colonel Eisenhower experienced first-hand the need for a road system during a 62-day expedition that “tested” America’s early 20th century road system.</p>
<p>General Eisenhower, during World War II, saw the great mobility of Germany through an extensive autobahn system in that country. He set out to bring a better system to America where a nation dependent upon automobiles and trucks yearned to travel the country, bring goods to market efficiently, and to provide sorely needed military mobility.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Publicizing the need for highways</span></strong></p>
<p>While GI’s returning from the war told stories of the great concrete bi-ways of Europe, it wasn’t until the early 1950s that the grounds swell to build an interstate system in the United States came into play. Such a vast program would have to be brought forth to the American public, and a relatively new vehicle to publicize this ambitious program called “television” was there for the taking.</p>
<p>In an article in the February 1954 issue of Better Roads titled “Want Public to Back Your Road Aims? Try Television” William F. Steuber, Assistant Engineer, Wisconsin State Highway Commission, espouses television as “the hottest medium today in getting and holding the attention of the public.” Steuber encourages readers to buy TV advertising time to focus on “public attention on road matters,” and to “tell the highway story.”</p>
<p>And what was the cost of television time in 1954 for local advertising for a quarter-hour to a half-hour? $60 to $600. (Compare this cost to the $3.5 million for a 30-second spot for the 2012 Super Bowl!).</p>
<p>Television would become an important tool in the effort to get the Interstate Program off and running.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/Eisenhower-Signing.jpg"  rel="shadowbox[post-16841];player=img;"><span style="font-size: small"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-16857" src="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/Eisenhower-Signing.jpg" alt="" width="299" height="173" /></span></a><span style="font-size: small">Eisenhower asks for gas tax retention…from the February 1954 issue</span></strong></p>
<p>In his state of the union address on January 9, 1954, President Eisenhower laid the groundwork for an expanded road program by asking for retention of the federal gas tax “to protect the vital interest of every citizen in a safe and adequate highway system.”</p>
<p>The federal gas tax in 1954 was 2-cents per gallon.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Federal-Aid Bill…the embryonic stages of the Interstate Highway System…from the March 1954 issue</span></strong></p>
<p>”Hearings were concluded in the house of representatives in February on Representative J. Harry McGregor’s (R-Ohio) federal-aid highway bill. The bill, which apparently, has the approval of President Eisenhower, provides a total of $800,000,000 for major highway purposes for each of the fiscal year’s 1956 and 1957—or $225,000,000 more annually than at present”…totaling a record $1.932 billion over two years.</p>
<p>(Note: the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFTEA-LU), the transportation bill during the 80th anniversary of Better Roads, provided $284 billion throughout a six-year period. At publication of this information, SAFETEA-LU had expired and was operating on extensions, while reauthorization of this highway bill is under development.).</p>
<p>Further to this, “Most controversial provisions of the McGregor bill involve the interstate and secondary systems” with the “controversy in regards to a debate on funding to be based on either population of the states, or on a matching funds system.</p>
<p>The bill passed in March, but the controversy about expanding the road effort nationwide sparked debate about building an interstate system.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/hollywoodfreeway.jpg"  rel="shadowbox[post-16841];player=img;"><span style="font-size: small"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-16859" src="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2011/11/hollywoodfreeway-300x187.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="187" /></span></a><span style="font-size: small">The Interstate Movement Swells…from the July 1954 issue</span></strong></p>
<p>”Secretary of Commerce Sinclair Weeks has announced that apportionments” for highway funding were released ‘6 months ahead of the time limit set by congress. This is the first step in the start of the new federal highway program for 1956 and 1957.’”</p>
<p>One note of interest in an item appearing in this issue… it was announced that the 10-mile “Hollywood Freeway in Los Angeles County, California has been completed and opened to traffic.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">President Eisenhower’s program</span></strong></p>
<p>It was reported in the August issue that the Eisenhower administration proposed a $50 billion, 10-year program to fund highways, an amount that would be in addition to the federal-aid bill funding.</p>
<p>Presented by Vice President Richard Nixon at the annual Governor’s Conference, the program consists of four major parts:</p>
<p>1) “A master plan for a highway system…with fast and safe transcontinental travel, intercity communication…and elimination of metropolitan area congestion.”</p>
<p>2) “Financing based on self-liquidation of each project” with funding through tolls, increased gas taxes or increased federal funds.”</p>
<p>3) “A cooperative alliance between the federal government and the states, so the local governments will be the managers in their areas.”</p>
<p>4) “A program initiated by the federal government with state cooperation, for planning and construction of a modern interstate highway system,” a 40,000 mile national network.</p>
<p>Eisenhower appointed “a cabinet committee to help formulate a comprehensive transportation policy for the nation.”</p>
<p>Note: Mr. C.M Nelson, editor of Better Roads starting with its first issue published in October 1931, passed away in September 1954. One of the nation’s road and bridge opinion leaders, Mr. Nelson died before he could realize the greatness of the interstate program, which he championed.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The problem of funding</span></strong></p>
<p>With the death of C.M. Nelson, it was months before a new editor would be appointed. With so little detail about the Eisenhower plan, it was several months before Better Roads provided meaningful commentary.</p>
<p>In a March 1955 editorial, newly appointed editor Gerald C. Ward, somewhat skeptical about the program’s funding mechanisms, said about the Interstate Program…</p>
<p>“A dream—a wonderful dream. But probably just that. The problem of money will undoubtedly spoil this dream.…In the end, the solution of the highway problem lies in the hands of those who would benefit most from an adequate network of roads and streets—the users. If…(we) can convince the ordinary highway user that in the long run he will pay less for good highways than he does now for bad ones, the money will be there and the dream realized.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Optimism for the New Year</span></strong></p>
<p>In December 1955, after months of ongoing debate about the Interstate Program, not IF it would happen, but WHEN and HOW it would be put in place, Editor Ward writes….</p>
<p>“The year, 1955, should end for highway officials on an optimistic note. Never before has there been such a widespread recognition of need to bring the 40,000-mile interstate highway system up to adequate standards as quickly as possible. Never before has the importance of all highway systems—state, county and local—been brought so strongly to the attention of the public.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">June 29, 1956</span></strong></p>
<p>President Dwight D. Eisenhower on June 29, 1956, signs the bill that provides the United States with its most extensive highway program ever, the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956! The bill provided the means to construct the interstate highway system and created the Highway Trust Fund.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Changing highway picture</span></strong></p>
<p>In the July 1956 issue of Better Roads, just days after the President signed the bill, Editor Gerald Ward, in his monthly editorial, wrote the following:</p>
<p>“An expanded national highway program is now a part of the law of the land. At all levels of government the highway picture will be changed. This is the time for cooperation.”</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small"> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The 1960s</span></strong></p>
<p>The1960s presented turbulent times. It was a decade of political and social change with events that would shape the nation and the world for many years to come; Vietnam, the assassination of the Kennedy’s, Dr. Martin Luther King, the passage of the Civil Right Bill, the first manned trip to the moon, and more.</p>
<p>For the highway industry, it was the decade of mobility.</p>
<p>It was a time of great technological transition, too, as computers were coming into primary usage in mainstream businesses, and engineering innovations in building roads and bridges, and in equipment and trucks was moving rapidly.</p>
<p>It was a time when all of the pieces to the road-building puzzle were put into place with the start of the great Interstate project, which began in 1956 coming to an end in the mid-sixties.</p>
<p>Feeder and secondary roads supporting the Interstate were being built and maintained during the decade, and the era of the mammoth earthmoving machines, and innovative paving equipment and techniques came into being.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The move from city to suburb and the migration west</span></strong></p>
<p>The 1960s were a decade of great mobility with steady migration from the cities to the suburbs, and from east to west.</p>
<p>In the Better Roads Forum column in the January 1960 issue, Editorial Director and Publisher, Alden F. Perrin, wrote about the move to the suburbs from the cities. “…the movement of people from the heart of the city to suburban areas has created a problem that counties all over the country have been trying to cope with. An important part of this problem is the county road in an area that is rapidly developing from rural to suburban or urban. In all probability the road will certainly become a city street.”</p>
<p>This op-ed piece goes on to say that these problems included counties that “rarely builds storm and sanitary sewers”; getting the “city to accept a county obligation within a city”; “road improvements (which) can’t wait for incorporation”, and “developers (who are) required to pay for road improvements”.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The Continuing Crisis</span></strong></p>
<p>In the March 1960 issue of Better Roads, it was reported “in order to work within the limits imposed by congress and the highway trust fund, the Bureau of Public Roads has imposed severe restrictions on state highway departments. These restrictions are resented by some state highway officials who think the federal government is interfering too much in what should be regarded essentially as a state program.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Forecast for the 1970s</span></strong></p>
<p>And this interesting tidbit from March 1960…”The Highway Departments of 48 states expect that in 1976 there will be 114,000,000 registered vehicles and they will be drive 1,200,000,000,000 miles that year consuming 97,000,000,000 gallons of fuel.’”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">California’s problems</span></strong></p>
<p>With the population of the state of California exploding, Better Roads in November 1960 reported “during the next 20 years 100,194 miles of county roads and city streets in California will need improvement at a total cost of $12,752,000,000….”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">President Kennedy weighs in on highways</span></strong></p>
<p>March 1961…. with talk of suspending the Interstate program in mid-stream, the following was reported by Better Roads:</p>
<p>“In his message to congress February 28, President John F. Kennedy declared that he was ‘wholly opposed to either stretching out or cutting back our highway program,’ and urged congress not to rely on either solution.” Kennedy said that “it would be unwise at a time when our ‘slump-ridden economy needs greater…not lesser construction activity…. and to postpone the completion of the Interstate system only further postpones the day when our highways will be adequate….”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Elvis has left the building….</span></strong></p>
<p>Here’s an amusing item… from the January 1962 issue of Better Roads…</p>
<p>“Rocks and Roll. Elvis Presley fans have given the Tennessee Department of Highways some extra work. His mansion near Memphis has attracted swarms of worshippers, who park to gape. Highway shoulders in the area developed dangerous potholes. It did no good to put gravel down because girls carried off the pebbles as souvenirs. So the department had to send out a crew to patch the holes and give the shoulders an asphaltic surface.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">A meandering economy stymies road construction</span></strong></p>
<p>The economy in 1963 moved along slowly, which had an inferior affect on the funding available for road building. Better Roads reported in “the 1963 sessions of state legislatures passed an astonishing variety of laws&#8230;only three states passed gasoline taxes …in 1963, and five states approved road-bond issues.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Sounds like a monorail to me!</span></strong></p>
<p>The August 1964 issue of Better Roads posted an article titled “Travel by Computer.”</p>
<p>“Mechanical engineering students at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) have been working on an automated automobile and road as an approach to the solution of highway problems. …the “Commucar’ could be driven anywhere, but it could be also used under automatic control on special roadways. Arms on each side of the compact, electric vehicle would draw power from a side rail on the throughway. Trips would be programmed for computer control. The students are convinced that their solution to the nation’s transit problems is better than (most) and that the special arteries can be laid over existing roads and mass-transit systems”.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Buckle-up for safety</span></strong></p>
<p>Better Roads’ January 1965 issue featured an article on seat belt usage in highway departments…</p>
<p>“Most safety experts agree that seat belts in use can mean the difference between life and death….” In a survey of 47 highway departments, “46 are using seat belts on some if not all passenger carrying vehicles…and 24 are using them on some trucks”.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The Passing of an Industry Giant: Alden F. Perrin</span></strong></p>
<p>On April 23, 1965, founder and publishing director of Better Roads, Alden F. Perrin, died. He was 78 years old.</p>
<p>In 1931, with an idea for a magazine to serve highway engineers and officials, he founded Better Roads. The magazine has grown for 80 years based on Mr. Perrin’s principals and sound publishing philosophy… that the publication should serve its readers, and serve them well.</p>
<p>In 2004, Alden F. Perrin was recognized as one of the Top 100 Most Influential Private Transportation Design and Construction Professionals of the 20th Century by the American Road &amp; Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) Foundation.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Computers become a big part of the industry</span></strong></p>
<p>While not every agency, engineering firm and contractor adopted computer systems by the late 1960’s, some did. In the January 1967 issue, Better Roads interviewed officials with the Utah Department of Highways in a story titled “Computer Turns Days Into Minutes.”</p>
<p>“Highway engineers can obtain answers to important engineering questions in time to make the best possible decisions. The computer has become an essential engineering tool, involved in every part of highway design…. Calculations that sometimes took months under manual methods are now accomplished in a few hours…”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">“Of Men and Machines”</span></strong></p>
<p>By the end of the 1960s, advances in construction equipment technology had reached new heights as bigger, more productive and efficient machinery was on the jobsite. From the introduction of the hydraulic scraper in 1962, the first articulated motor grader in 1967, the emergence of the hydraulic excavator and sophisticated paving equipment by end of the decade, the sixties were rampant with new products and new innovations.</p>
<p>John Benson, Executive Director of CIMA, the Construction Industry Manufacturers Association, (now the Association of Equipment Manufacturers) wrote in an article previewing CONEXPO ’69 in the January 1969 issue of Better Roads, “Innovations in construction equipment have traditionally been regarded as refinements aimed at increasing the productive capabilities of that equipment…. advances are being made because of the ever-accelerating accent on the faster, more work-producing equipment.”</p>
<p>Among the innovations sited by Mr. Benson to be introduced on equipment at the 1969 show were hydrostatic drive, automatic braking systems, automated batch plant systems, audible warning and signal light systems, and laser technology.</p>
<p>Mr. Benson goes on to tout Conexpo 1969 by saying, “We used to call it the Road Show, which will be held at the International Amphitheatre in Chicago…. More than 160 leading manufacturers of construction equipment will exhibit more than 1000 pieces of machinery valued at $25 million” with 250,000 square feet of exhibit space and 80,000 attendees.”</p>
<p>For the record, at Conexpo-Con/Agg 2011 over 2400 companies exhibited using 2.34 million square feet of space with more than 120,000 attendees.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">“Building Roads to Serve All the People”</span></strong></p>
<p>In an editorial titled “Building Roads to Serve All the People” by Editor, Stanley E. Boie wrote in the December 1969 issue of Better Roads, the last issue of the decade, “Most of us concerned with the business of highways have had little difficulty accepting the oft-repeated slogan, ‘Highways are for people,’ a sentiment that should followed today as we plan, design and fund our highways and bridges.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small"> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The 1970s</span></strong></p>
<p>The 1970s was a crazy decade for the highway construction industry and the construction economy in general.</p>
<p>With many of the Eisenhower interstate projects still under construction, and with the massive need for secondary roads built mostly in suburban areas, the decade was divided between the best and worst of times.</p>
<p>Beginning near the end of the Vietnam era with Richard M. Nixon as president and ending with the reign of Jimmy Carter whose administration was marred by extraordinary inflation and high interest rates, the decade was filled with economic woes. In addition to high interest rates, the gas shortage and the start of high-energy prices, high interest rates, a stagnant housing market and an economy that wandered like a balloon in the wind were watermarks of the decade.</p>
<p>While some will remember the 1970s for Watergate, the U.S. Bicentennial in 1976, and the oil embargo, Skylab, “Star Wars”, pet rocks, and disco, it was also a decade when traffic on highways increased nearly 80 percent. It was a period when many airports were newly built, including DFW in Dallas, or expanding, such as Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport.</p>
<p>In addition, heavy expenditures for mass transportation programs in big cities was the “solution” that many politicians believed would help solve urban crisis at the sacrifice of building main arteries to the growing suburban areas, and to complete the remaining 13,000 miles of the 42,500-mile interstate, which lingered into its 14th year in 1970.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Planning for tomorrow’s transportation</span></strong></p>
<p>In a January 1970 Better Roads editorial,” Planning for Tomorrow’s Transportation,” the first issue of the decade, the magazine’s chief editor at the time, Stanley E. Boie opined that the 1970s would be a decade of hope, but not without “pressing needs facing highway departments—completing the interstate highway system, improved safety, solution to the problems of transportation in urban areas, adequate financing and better planning….”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The need for “hardware”</span></strong></p>
<p>Perhaps one of the most controversial U.S. Secretary’s of Transportation in U.S. history was John Volpe. A former governor of Massachusetts, Volpe was named U.S. Secretary of Transportation following the election of Richard Nixon in 1968 where Volpe served from 1969 to 1973.</p>
<p>During his administration as Secretary of Transportation, Amtrak was created.</p>
<p>In the January 1970 issue of Better Roads, Volpe discussed the problems of urban transportation planning. “Urban planners are handicapped…by the absence of hardware—the necessary equipment to do the job. We don’t have the time to wait for the hardware to be developed. If our urban centers are to survive, we must move beyond the study stage and start doing something now.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The challenge lies….for the quality of life</span></strong></p>
<p>One of the great advocates for highway funding was Jennings Randolph (D-WV), who served in the Senate from 1958 to 1985. Randolph led the fight for funding in the 1970’s during a time when money for roads was sparse. In an op-ed piece in the January 1970 issue, Sen. Randolph, who was chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Public Works at the time, wrote, “The challenge lies ahead in correctly analyzing the needs of Americans, as we move steadily toward the year 2000 to provide an imaginative, workable program that will ensure the quality of life which we now enjoy. Nothing less than the best will suffice.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Work toward a better environment</span></strong></p>
<p>The battle lines for environmental reform were well-set in the 1970s and Better Roads Editor Stan Boie was an early advocate of engineering environmental friendly highway and bridge projects at a time when the industry struggled with change. While the environmental movement among highway professionals had not yet gained wide-reaching support, in a February 1970 editorial Boie took a stance not embraced by the highway community at large for the time.</p>
<p>“Breathe there a highway engineer today with soul so insensitive that he is not concerned with the way that highways affect people and the environment? We hope not. For if there is, he is playing in the wrong ballgame in the wrong ballpark,” Boie opined.</p>
<p>“The transcendent word today is ‘environment’ and all highway people had better learn how to pronounce it and say it loud and clear—and believe it. Because the condition of the environment has become of prime importance to a growing portion of the population.”</p>
<p>“Certainly, it (the environmental movement) must grow if highways are to play any part in helping the nation achieve the goals of clean air, clean water, freedom of movement and the good life.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Governor freezes Massachusetts road projects</span></strong></p>
<p>In a move very typical of the times when highway money was being diverted to mass transportation, Massachusetts Republican Gov. Francis Sargent stated a new policy calling for “placing less emphasis on highways and more on rapid-transit facilities.”</p>
<p>The governor said that “we (once) felt that new highways were the answer to our transportation problems. We were wrong. We need a more balanced system of transportation.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Interstate progress…from the April 1970 issue</span></strong></p>
<p>Better Roads reported on the progress of the interstate program, which was to be completed by June 30, 1970.</p>
<p>Citing massive delays in projects and inadequate funding for projects engineered 15 to 20 years prior, it was reported that “As of December 31, 1969, almost 29,640 miles of the 42,500-mile national system of interstate and defense highways were open to traffic and construction was under way on another 4,782 miles.”</p>
<p>It would be six years before the core interstate roads would be completed.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">What next Mr. President…</span></strong></p>
<p>Newly appointed Better Roads Editor Frank Reid took a shot at the Nixon Administration for diverting as much as half of the highway trust fund to mass transit.</p>
<p>In an editorial in the April 1973 issue, Reid wrote, “Once again, Mr. Nixon, we find ‘Alice in Wonderland’ thinking running rampant in your Federal Highway Administration. Evidentially charged with supporting your raid on the Highway Trust Fund, they have come up with a new twist…The Trust Fund is not really a trust. Why not? Because a long while ago, before 1956, that is, no trust fund existed and there was a gas tax! Not only was the gas tax not earmarked, it went directly into the General Fund.”</p>
<p>“Perhaps if every highway department would send the White House pictures of the accidents that have occurred on roads and streets that have been designated for improvement and haven’t been improved due to fund impoundment, perhaps then, Mr. President, some understanding of the great need for the Trust Fund to be honored might be generated.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Conexpo ‘75</span></strong></p>
<p>In the January 1975 issue, it was reported that “thousands of state, county, city and municipal highway engineers, officials and contractors will be among the nearly 100,000 persons expected to attend Conexpo 75, the biggest world-wide heavy equipment exposition during its run from February 9 to 14 in Chicago.”</p>
<p>“The ‘World’s Fair of the Construction Industry’ will fill more than two million square feet of space available at McCormick Place (in Chicago) and the International Amphitheatre….”</p>
<p>“Chicago’s Mayor Richard M. Daley has proclaimed the week of February 9-14, 1975 as Construction Equipment Week in Chicago…”</p>
<p>“Notables from more than 100 countries, including Soviet Russia are going to be in attendance.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Special Mention….most amusing items of the decade</span></strong></p>
<p>Among the most amusing items appearing in Better Roads during the 1970s, here are a few standouts.</p>
<p>No Baloney: “About the time you get to thinking that all of the ideas for ribbon-cutting ceremonies have been used up, someone comes up with another one. The one used in Michigan last November may not have been the best, but it certainly was the wurst—a 14-ft. chain of bratwurst, knockwurst, metwurst, and braunschweiger, which was stretched across Michigan Route 83 in downtown Frankenmuth,” a town founded by Bavarian Germans. The “ribbon” was cut using a 25-pound meat cleaver during a ceremony marking completion of a million-dollar improvement of the highway.</p>
<p>Buggy Road: “The Amish community of Reno County, Kansas has petitioned the county commissioner to set aside a road to accommodate the horse and buggy,” as automobiles have been going at faster speeds, scaring the horses.”</p>
<p>Church Note: “Services of all kinds will be available at one location….at the Arlington Temple Methodist Church in suburban Washington, D.C. The congregation is erecting a church over a gas station situated in the midst of modern high-rise buildings.”</p>
<p>Motorist-skating: “New Jersey’s Garden State Parkway has developed a spacious ice-skating rink for the use of the motoring public. It is in the grass mall before the Garden State Arts Center amphitheater. Sandbags were placed around the perimeter of the mall area, a tarpaulin liner was put down and water was hosed in to freeze the skating surface. The rink is open to motorists using the toll road.”</p>
<p>Computers monitor traffic: From the December 1973 issue…“Michigan’s first computerized traffic signal control system, typing all traffic signals into a controlled network, will be installed in the Lansing-East Lansing area, the State Highway Commission has announced.”</p>
<p>“The heart of the centralized system is a digital computer….which will be connected to nearly 200 existing traffic signals in both cities” along with “traffic detecting sensors, installed in pavements on approaches to key area traffic signals” feeding traffic flow information into the central computer.</p>
<p>Drinking drivers: From New South Wales Australia…“In an effort to combat the drinking driver problem, the NSW Traffic Accident Research Unit came up with a mass media campaign to shame drunken drivers into reforming their behavior by calling them ‘slobs.’</p>
<p>Patrol Cars: Patrol cars display the good old red, white and blue while cruising the Ohio highways complete with decals reading “The Spirit of ’76—American Revolution Bicentennial—1776-1976”—as a way of celebrating the nation’s bicentennial.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The Impossible Dream…or is it?</span></strong></p>
<p>As the 1970,s ended, a Better Roads editorial looked back on the previous nine years and into the future.</p>
<p>“It appears that most everyone would like better roads…although this concept in many ways meets the priorities of and impossible dream….”</p>
<p>However, that “Impossible Dream” can be brought about simply by a meaningful distribution of all taxes….The proper funding of our vital national asset—our roadway system—is critically needed so that highway engineers and officials can obtain the best&#8212;not the cheapest—but the best equipment, materials, and services to protect our investment in that system. The time is now to meet the challenge by making the needed changes—to see the “Impossible Dream” becomes reality.”</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><strong>The 1980s</strong></span></p>
<p>The 1980s were pivotal toward moving transportation construction forward.</p>
<p>The need for federally funded highway construction and improvement projects was apparent at the beginning of the 1980,s as the first of the interstate roads were rapidly approaching 25 years of age.</p>
<p>In the middle of rampant inflation, unemployment and interest rates as high as 20 percent, the highway industry was challenged to reauthorize the federal aid highway program. Ironically, the fiscally conservative Reagan administration supported increased highway user fees to fund highway construction.</p>
<p>The bill was passed in January 1983 and included a 5-cent per gallon increase on the gas tax.</p>
<p>In 1986, the reauthorization debate was again addressed by Congress, as money for highways depleted. While President Reagan vetoed the bill, Congress voted to override, so highway funding was put in place.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small"> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">The 1990s</span></strong></p>
<p>In 1991 a new federal surface transportation program was finalized through the passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). In addition to maintaining roads, this bill enabled the country to complete many of the plans for interstate highways that were included as far back as the Eisenhower plan in 1956.</p>
<p>A 5-cent per gallon gas tax was the main driver of funding and authorizations of $155 billion in funding equal was provided over a 6-year period. President Bill Clinton in 1997 approved the National Economic Crossroads Transportation Efficiency Act (NEXTEA), which served as a guideline for highway construction spending during the following six years.</p>
<p>While public investment in highways and bridges declined in the last half of the 20th century, the need to maintain an ever crumbling road system was noted at local levels with many states passing road improvement programs. Still, as the decade ended, it wasn’t enough to keep with the demand brought upon by increases truck and car traffic.</p>
<p>In 1998, the Transportation Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) was made law with about $200 billion allocated for highway and bridge construction through 2003.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small"> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">2000 to the present</span></strong></p>
<p>Under TEA-21, in 2001 federal investment in highways was more than $30 billion, a nearly 6 percent increase from 2000. This included better than normal gas tax revenues that contributed to the Highway Trust Fund (HTF).</p>
<p>TEA-21 expired on September 30, 2003, but was extended several times until a new bill became law in 2005, which expired September 30, 2009. That bill has been extended eight times to date with the most recent extension set to expire March 31, 2012.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Where do we go from here?</span></strong></p>
<p>There are more than 4 million miles of roads in the United States with about 2.5 million miles paved roads and 1.5 million miles unpaved.</p>
<p>It might be difficult to comprehend that the need for something we take for granted everyday of the week, our highways and bridges, continues to grow.</p>
<p>From a national highway system built in the 1950s to accommodate a population at that time of 140 million people to one today with not much more in added lane-mile capacity, we are asking our system to move a population of 312 million people in 2011. That fact in itself is enough to demonstrate the need for long-term growth.</p>
<p>In short, here are four primary reasons why the highway and bridge system will grow in the next 25 years:</p>
<p>· Ever-worsening traffic gridlock that is now costing the U.S. economy $78 billion a year and growing in lost productivity and wasted motor fuel;</p>
<p>· A projected doubling of U.S. truck traffic in the next 25 years with just modest U.S. economic growth;</p>
<p>· The more than 43,000 lives lost and $230 billion in lost productivity, insurance and property costs annually due to motor vehicle crashes;</p>
<p>· The need for North America to compete: Massive, on-going investments in new transportation infrastructure capacity being made by China, India and the European Union to facilitate their quest to be global economic superpowers.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><strong>Poised for more growth…</strong>.</span></p>
<p>· 4 million miles of roads that need to be maintained all year long</p>
<p>· 594,000 bridges in just the U.S. with nearly 30 percent of them classified as functionally obsolete or structurally deficient ;</p>
<p>· A growing population already at 312 million people; and</p>
<p>· Perhaps as much as $500 billion or more in the new highway bill scheduled for renewal in the coming months.</p>
<p>Better Roads will be there every step of the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/celebrating-80-years-of-better-roads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$745 million from U.S. DOT slated for Northeast Corridor construction</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/745-million-from-u-s-dot-slated-for-northeast-corridor-construction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/745-million-from-u-s-dot-slated-for-northeast-corridor-construction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Barbaccia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eRoadPro Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acela Express trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catenary poles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concrete ties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction on Harold Interlocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Railroad Administrator Joseph C. Szabo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving transportation opportunities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miles of track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new routes that allow Amtrak trains to bypass the busiest passenger rail junction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northeast Corridor (NEC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaining walls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterroads.com/?p=15284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood on Aug. 22 announced nearly $745  million for construction along the Northeast Corridor  (NEC) to upgrade  some of the most heavily-used sections.
The NEC will receive $449.94  million to  upgrade electrical systems and tracks between Trenton, NJ  and New York City,  resulting in improved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood </strong>on Aug. 22 announced nearly $745  million for construction along the<strong> Northeast Corridor  (NEC)</strong> to upgrade  some of the most heavily-used sections.</p>
<p>The NEC will receive $449.94  million to  upgrade electrical systems and tracks between Trenton, NJ  and New York City,  resulting in improved on-time performance and  reliability, and an initial  increase in top operating speeds up to 160  mph and future maximum speeds of 186  mph. Another $294.78 million will   alleviate major delays for trains coming in and out of Manhattan with  <strong>new  routes that allow Amtrak trains to bypass the busiest passenger  rail junction </strong>in the nation.</p>
<p>“These grants are a win for our economy and a win for  commuters all  along the Northeast Corridor,” said <strong>LaHood </strong>in a written statement. “We are  creating  new construction jobs, ordering American-made supplies and <strong>improving   transportation opportunities</strong> across a region where 50 million Americans  live  and work.”</p>
<p>The Aug. 22 announcement is part of the Obama Administration’s  unprecedented capital  investment in the Northeast Corridor, and the  improvements will allow for the  fastest passenger train speeds attained  in North America to date.</p>
<p>Thanks to  these investments, <strong><em>Acela Express </em>trains </strong>will soon reach up to 160 mph  (up from 135 mph today) along a 24-mile  segment of the corridor between Trenton  and New Brunswick, NJ, with the  replacement of electrical catenary,  supplemented power supply, and  modernized signals and tracks.  In the future, as Amtrak purchases new,  next  generation high-speed train sets, passengers will travel at  world-class speeds  of 186 mph along the improved track.</p>
<p>Improvements to the  Harold Interlocking rail junction in Queens  will eliminate congestion between  intercity and commuter trains and  allow for the future growth of high-speed  service along the corridor.  A  new  flyover will separate Amtrak trains travelling between New   York  and Boston from Long Island  Railroad and Metro-North commuter trains,  and NJ Transit trains accessing  Sunnyside Maintenance Yard in Queens.</p>
<p>“With gas prices on  the rise and congestion clogging our roads,  more and more Americans are  choosing to travel by train,” said<strong> Federal  Railroad Administrator Joseph C.  Szabo</strong>.  “With our population expected  to  grow by 100 million more people between now and 2050, we are  investing in a  high-speed rail system that connects to other modes of  transportation, reduces  congestion and improves the efficiency and  reliability of travel in America. Increasing  speeds and improving  service on the Northeast Corridor, which is the most  heavily-traveled  passenger rail corridor in the nation, is a crucial part of  our  effort.”</p>
<p>Both projects are expected  to generate 12,000 jobs.  Pre-construction  work between Trenton and New York City will begin in  late 2011, with initial  construction commencing in 2012.   The project  is expected to create 400  jobs per year over the period of  construction. Through the Obama  Administration’s strict implementation  of the “Buy America” requirement, the  opportunity for U.S.  manufacturers and suppliers continues as more than 100  miles of wire,  hundreds of catenary poles, and a large volume of electrical  equipment  such as transformers will be used as part of the upgrades.</p>
<p><strong>Construction on  Harold Interlocking </strong>will begin in September  2012, creating 9,200 jobs  over the length of the project, and include  the procurement of new s<strong>witches,  miles of track, concrete ties,  bridges, signal towers, catenary poles, and  retaining walls</strong>.</p>
<p>Thirty-two states across the U.S. and the District of Columbia   are currently laying the foundation for high-speed rail corridors to  link  Americans with faster and more energy-efficient travel options.  The <strong>American  Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) </strong>and annual appropriations  have provided $10.1  billion to put America on track towards  providing  new and expanded rail access to communities and improving the   reliability, speed, and frequency of existing service. Of that, more  than $7.3  billion has been obligated to date, according to U.S. DOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/745-million-from-u-s-dot-slated-for-northeast-corridor-construction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Anderson&#8217;s American Iron</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/mike-andersons-american-iron-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/mike-andersons-american-iron-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Iron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONEXPO-CON/AGG 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterroads.com/?p=10359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.betterroads.com/mike-andersons-american-iron-7/'><img src='http://www.betterroads.com/files/2010/11/MikeUntitled-1.jpg' class='imgtfe' width='70' alt='Image with no title' /></a><a href='http://www.betterroads.com/mike-andersons-american-iron-7/'><img src='http://www.betterroads.com/files/2010/11/MikeUntitled-1.jpg' class='imgtfe' width=100 alt='Image with no title' /></a><img src='http://www.betterroads.com/files/2010/11/MikeUntitled-1.jpg' class='imgtfe' width=170 alt='Image with no title' />Please keep telling anyone and everyone you can about the need for proper funding of infrastructure, including but not exclusively highways and bridges.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2010/11/MikeUntitled-1.jpg"  rel="shadowbox[post-10359];player=img;"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-10360" title="MikeUntitled-1" src="http://www.betterroads.com/files/2010/11/MikeUntitled-1.jpg" alt="" width="63" height="85" /></a><span style="font-size: medium">Walking out on a springboard</span></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: x-small">By Mike Anderson</span></strong></p>
<p>If the past few months are any indication, we’re all going to be busier in 2011.</p>
<p>I know, I know. Some of you have undoubtedly already said, “Well, it couldn’t get any slower.” In some jurisdictions, no doubt.</p>
<p>Regardless, as keep-hanging-on-’til-things-get-better 2010 trips toward the finish line, an admittedly unscientific, completely anecdotal report by, umm, yours truly says more construction equipment both will be put to market and, of greater import, will be put to work next year.</p>
<p>Why? Unlike much of the past two years or more, folks who make and sell machinery have been asking for our collective audience a lot lately. The dozen editors of the magazines and digital properties that comprise Randall-Reilly’s Construction Division, including Better Roads, have been indeed running the roads, or rather the airport concourses. Labor Day was barely put to rest, and on came the steady stream of invitations to come see the newest this and the shhh-don’t-say-anything-quite-yet that.</p>
<p>A cautious view, perhaps even a pessimistic one, would chalk up all of our frequent flyer miles to the looming CONEXPO-CON/AGG 2011, more specifically that equipment makers are simply stoking barely breathing fires to try to make any sort of splash at the Vegas trade show that comes around every three years (and, man, does March 2008 seem like a lifetime ago or what?). Absolutely, this upcoming March’s show is a target for construction product designers, developers and marketers who, when things went south not long after the last CONEXPO-CON/AGG, were forced to abruptly pull in an oar or two, evaluate where they were going, adjust accordingly and, quite slowly and perhaps even more quietly, start to plow ahead for 2011. With their big show now in sight, they’re anxious, excited, a little more proud and, for some for the first time in a while, demanding a spotlight. Good. There’s nothing wrong with that.</p>
<p>But CONEXPO-CON/AGG 2011 is not simply a temporary reprieve. It is the springboard for the next era of equipment that will continue to develop this country, this continent and much of this world. The machinery unveiled and displayed will be the cleanest, most efficient, most profit-friendly you’ve ever worked . . . and, we fully trust, when you get back home from Vegas, the need for that gear will grow, not vanish as what happened to some of you last time. It’ll take time, and the long road will be traveled in small steps, and that road won’t exactly find its way to a mountain top as in previous go-rounds, but it’ll roll out in front of you nonetheless.</p>
<p>In the meantime, please keep telling anyone and everyone you can about the need for proper funding of infrastructure, including but not exclusively highways and bridges. The hangover of a mid-term election is not a time to let up, not a time to “let them settle in” first. In fact, it’s probably the best time to remind your representatives why you’ve just elected them.</p>
<p>It’s all about the future. And we’re betting we’ll see y’all there . . . at CONEXPO-CON/AGG 2011 and beyond.v</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/mike-andersons-american-iron-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bridge Collapses in Minnesota II</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/bridge-collapses-in-minnesota-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/bridge-collapses-in-minnesota-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Latta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Roadologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highway Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterroads.com/?p=9877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of those stories I have to be careful with. The basic story is that a milling machine toppled partly into water when a section of the river bridge it was working on collapsed.It is not the I-35W story again, and it is not blogged here as a sensational story. If anything the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those stories I have to be careful with. The basic story is that a milling machine toppled partly into water when a section of the river bridge it was working on collapsed.It is not the I-35W story again, and it is not blogged here as a sensational story. If anything the Minnesota connection is coincidence. It is a small story and no one was apparently badly injured.</p>
<p>But the story is important because there is no doubt left that a worryingly high percentage of America&#8217;s bridges are in bad shape and the lack of funding the industry faces means far too many of them will stay that way.I have just finished editing <em>Better Roads</em> November cover story which inventories America&#8217;s bridges. The numbers aren&#8217;t good.</p>
<p>So these stories will happen. This collapse is a symptom of the problem. I don&#8217;t want to scare people and make more of this than it is, but the public is largely unaware or in some cases uncaring, about the reality of our crumbling infrastructure. They need to know this is a real problem with real consequences to everyday life.</p>
<p>Bridges will not start falling like pieces of sky, I&#8217;m not in a Chicken Little suit here. But poor bridges need fixing. Period.</p>
<p>Read the entire<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dglobe.com/event/article/id/42002/" > bridge collapse story</a> from the Worthington Daily Globe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/bridge-collapses-in-minnesota-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upon further review &#8212; a Stimulus update</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/upon-further-review-a-stimulus-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/upon-further-review-a-stimulus-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Latta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From Our Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Roadologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eRoadPro Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterroads.com/?p=9609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) has released a new report on the Recovery Act, arguing with numbers and project stories that the Stimulus is working and working well.
According to AASHTO executive director John Horsley ,&#8221;These are big numbers. Billions of dollars being invested in transportation projects that are creating paychecks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) has released a new report on the Recovery Act, arguing with numbers and project stories that the Stimulus is working and working well.</p>
<p>According to AASHTO executive director John Horsley ,&#8221;These are big numbers. Billions of dollars being invested in transportation projects that are creating paychecks for hundreds of thousands of construction workers hard hit by unemployment rates that were well above 20 percent earlier this year. And when you consider that more than 6,000 highway and bridge projects and nearly 25-hundred transit projects have already been completed, you can see first hand how states are delivering for the American people.”</p>
<p>The report says that the stimulus is working in every state. &#8220;More than $40 billion in highway and transit projects have been approved and are moving forward—almost $30 billion are under contract on 16,761 different projects. More than 63,000 direct on-project jobs have been created or sustained in August as a result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and states have already paid out $3.2 billion in payroll.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">Some  numbers:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">As of August 31, 20101:</p>
<p>Highways and Bridges:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">+ Federal Highway Administration has approved 13,077 highway projects totaling $26.4 billion. Of these projects:<br />
• Out to bid: 12,739 projects totaling $25.5 billion<br />
• Signed contracts: 12,371 projects totaling $24.7 billion<br />
• Work underway: 11,978 projects, totaling $24.1 billion<br />
• Work completed: 6,154 projects, totaling $5.4 billion or 21 percent of funds<br />
+ When completed, these funds will improve 35,399 miles of highways, and 1,264 bridges</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot more. Read <a href="http://recovery.transportation.org/ARRA-2.pdf">AASHTO&#8217;s latest Stimulus report</a> here.</p>
<p>And by the way, Horsley also provides a stat that you can use to try and pry funds out of politicians, especially those facing election campaigns: “For every dollar spent in keeping a road in good condition the American taxpayer saves $10 to rebuild a deteriorated road.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/upon-further-review-a-stimulus-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty Job&#8217;s Mike Rowe launches AEM campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/dirty-jobs-mike-rowe-launches-aem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/dirty-jobs-mike-rowe-launches-aem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Barbaccia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eRoadPro Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a majority of all voters (53 percent) said they think “worse” of the economic stimulus package when they find out that only 3 percent of its funding was dedicated to rebuilding highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a national grassroots campaign to promote U.S. manufacturing jobs through infrastructure investment and passage of export agreements. Infrastructure investment and export agreements are proven ways to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a strong majority – 66 percent – believes “Given current economic conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America’s economy will suffer and our competitive position in the world will be threatened.” The I Make America website www.IMakeAmerica.com highlights the disproportionate job losses in the equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an outspoken advocate of the trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and founder of the site www.mikeroweWORKS.com. “Our roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and the stuff we can’t always see]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[are falling apart around us. Fixing the infrastructure is a job that will have no end]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as well as the businesses that rely on them and the communities they support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM) and Mike Rowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing and a European presence in Brussels.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but if we don’t get started]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean water and flood control systems. • Help our farmers and manufacturers create more jobs in the U.S. by exporting their products to new markets around the world. “We need to dramatically increase ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creator and host of Discovery Channel’s “Dirty Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. for the launch of I Make America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Make America showcases short videos at http://www.ADayinAmericanLife.com from employees and small business owners around the country telling the real life stories of how manufacturing impacts the na]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it’ll be the end of us.” Since 2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it’s a good time to build and repair America’s roads and bridges.” “America’s infrastructure is the connective tissue that keeps society out of the ditch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining and utility sectors worldwide. AEM is headquartered in Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more than 4.7 million manufacturing jobs have been lost. I Make America is a resource for workers in the manufacturing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roads and bridges. Yet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[runways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to send a message to Congress that we need new manufacturing policies that will create badly needed jobs now. The message of I Make America is that America needs a new manufacturing policy that create]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with offices in the capitals of Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[” joined forces today in Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[” said AEM President Dennis Slater. “Until these things are done]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[” said Mike Rowe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterroads.com/?p=9556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM) and Mike Rowe, creator and host of Discovery Channel’s “Dirty Jobs,” joined forces today in Washington, D.C. for the launch of I Make America, a national grassroots campaign to promote U.S. manufacturing jobs through infrastructure investment and passage of export agreements. Infrastructure investment and export agreements are proven ways to create [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.aem.org/" >Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM)</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.mikeroweworks.com/" >Mike Rowe</a>, creator and host of Discovery Channel’s “<em>Dirty Jobs,” </em>joined forces today in Washington, D.C. for the launch of <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.imakeamerica.com/" >I Make America</a>,</strong> a national grassroots campaign to promote U.S. manufacturing jobs through infrastructure investment and passage of export agreements. Infrastructure investment and export agreements are proven ways to create and sustain jobs for U.S. workers.  (View a video of the event at <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.IMakeAmerica.com/Launch"  target="_blank">www.IMakeAmerica.com/Launch</a></em>.)</p>
<p>According to a recent poll conducted by Clarus Research, a majority of all voters (53 percent) said they think “worse” of the economic stimulus package when they find out that only 3 percent of its funding was dedicated to rebuilding highways, roads and bridges.  Yet, a strong majority – 66 percent – believes “Given current economic conditions, it’s a good time to build and repair America’s roads and bridges.”</p>
<p>“America’s infrastructure is the connective tissue that keeps society out of the ditch,” said Mike<br />
Rowe, an outspoken advocate of the trades, and founder of the<strong> </strong>site<strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.mikeroweworks.com/" >www.mikeroweWORKS.com</a>. </strong>“Our roads, railways, runways, and the stuff we can’t always see, are falling apart around us. Fixing the infrastructure is a job that will have no end, but if we don’t get started, it’ll be the end of us.”</p>
<p>Since 2001, more than 4.7 million manufacturing jobs have been lost. <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.imakeamerica.com/" >I Make America</a> </strong>is a resource for workers in the manufacturing industry, as well as the businesses that rely on them and the communities they support, to send a message to Congress that we need new manufacturing policies that will create badly needed jobs now.</p>
<p>The message of <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.imakeamerica.com/" >I Make America</a></strong> is that America needs a new manufacturing policy that creates jobs by doing two fundamental things:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Generate economic activity by rebuilding and modernizing America’s infrastructure</strong> – roads, bridges, sewer, clean water and flood control systems.</li>
<li>Help our farmers and manufacturers create more jobs in the U.S. by exporting their products to new markets around the world.</li>
</ul>
<p>“We need to dramatically increase American manufacturing jobs so our economy can compete with other countries and our equipment manufacturers are able to prosper and grow right here in the United States,” said AEM President Dennis Slater. “Until these things are done, America’s economy will suffer and our competitive position in the world will be threatened.”</p>
<p>The <strong>I Make America </strong>website <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imakeamerica.com/" >www.IMakeAmerica.com</a> highlights the disproportionate job losses in the equipment manufacturing sector and related industries and provides facts on benefits to American prosperity from supporting policies that protect and grow this industry.</p>
<p>Additionally, <strong>I Make America</strong> showcases short videos at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.adayinamericanlife.com/" >http://www.ADayinAmericanLife.com</a> from employees and small business owners around the country telling the real life stories of how manufacturing impacts the national economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/dirty-jobs-mike-rowe-launches-aem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TRIP: Show N.H. the money for failing bridges, roads</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/trip-show-n-h-the-money-for-failing-bridges-roads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/trip-show-n-h-the-money-for-failing-bridges-roads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Barbaccia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridges and Transit Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moving New Hampshire Forward: The Condition and Funding of New Hampshire’s Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.H.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterroads.randallreillycms.com/?p=7805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One-third of New Hampshire’ major roads are deteriorated, 32 percent of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and more than half of the state’s roads are congested during peak travel times, but the state lacks adequate funding to make needed improvements to its surface transportation system, according to a news report from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One-third of New Hampshire’ major roads are deteriorated, 32 percent of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and more than half of the state’s roads are congested during peak travel times, but the state lacks adequate funding to make needed improvements to its surface transportation system, according to a news report from the Washington, D.C.-based national transportation organization TRIP.</p>
<p>TRIP’s report, &#8220;Moving New Hampshire Forward: The Condition and Funding of New Hampshire’s Roads, Bridges and Transit Systems,” finds that increased investment in the state’s transportation infrastructure could improve road and bridge conditions, enhance safety and support long-term economic growth in the state.</p>
<p>The report finds that 12 percent of the state’s major roadways are in poor condition and an additional 21 percent are in mediocre condition. Roads in need of repair cost each New Hampshire motorist an average of $259annually in extra vehicle operating costs – $267 million statewide &#8211; including accelerated vehicle depreciation, additional repair costs and increased fuel consumption and tire wear.</p>
<p>The TRIP report includes a list of sections of roadway throughout the state that are in need of reconstruction or pavement preservation work that can not be completed due to a lack of transportation funds. These include improvements to several sections of I-93 and I-89, as well as NH 12 and NH 16.</p>
<p>“New Hampshire built one of the finest highway systems in the country with our Federal Highway Administration partners.</p>
<p>As our state continues to take proper care of the system, meet our bridge repair needs, and build the new capacity for I-93, we need that funding partner more than ever. Today’s TRIP report documents the challenges,” said George Campbell, commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Transportation. “Transportation is the backbone of the American and New Hampshire economies, and deferring addressing these urgent needs will result in significantly higher expenses for the next generation. At the NHDOT we all call on Congress to act and reauthorize the federal transportation legislation.”</p>
<p>In addition to deteriorated road conditions, 16 percent of New Hampshire’s bridges are structurally deficient and an additional 16 percent are functionally obsolete. The state’s roads are also becoming increasingly crowded, as commuting and commerce are constrained by growing traffic congestion on New Hampshire’ major urban roads.</p>
<p>In 2008, 51 percent of the state’s urban highways were congested during peak travel times. The TRIP report contains a list of needed transportation projects throughout the state that would repair and replace deficient bridges, increase roadway capacity and improve the state’s transit system. However, these projects can not move forward without additional transportation funding.</p>
<p>“The TRIP report findings validate why the state established the Commission to Study Future Sustainable Revenue Sources for Funding Improvements to State and Municipal Highways and Bridges,&#8221; said state representative Candace Bouchard. &#8220;Current state funding is inadequate to keep up with routine maintenance, let alone finish widening I-93 and construct other needed new transportation projects. Transportation is jobs – construction jobs and the moving of goods and services. It is imperative that Congress do its part and adequately fund surface transportation with a timely and predictable program.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last year’s federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), more commonly known as &#8220;the stimulus,&#8221; provides nearly $129 million in funding for highway and bridge improvements and $13 million for public transit improvements in New Hampshire.</p>
<p>This funding has served as an important down payment on needed road, highway, bridge and transit improvements but is not sufficient to allow the state to proceed with numerous projects needed to modernize its surface transportation system. The federal surface transportation program, which expires on December 31, 2010, remains a critical source of funding for road and bridge repairs and transit improvements in New Hampshire. It will be critical that Congress crafts and approves a new federal surface transportation program that could include a significant boost in funding for highway and transit improvements in New Hampshire.</p>
<p>“While the state has put a combination of federal and state funds to good use in the past, in the coming years, many additional needed projects will remain stranded on the drawing board because of insufficient funding,” said Will Wilkins, executive director of TRIP. “It is critical that the state adequately fund its transportation system and that Congress produces a timely and adequately funded federal surface transportation program. Thousands of jobs and the state’s economy are riding on it.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/trip-show-n-h-the-money-for-failing-bridges-roads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lura offers screed system as free trial to DOTs</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/lura-offers-screed-system-as-free-trial-to-dots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/lura-offers-screed-system-as-free-trial-to-dots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Barbaccia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOTs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lura Enterprises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lightning Strike Concrete Screed System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterroads.randallreillycms.com/?p=7679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.betterroads.com/lura-offers-screed-system-as-free-trial-to-dots/'><img src='http://betterroads.randallreillycms.com/files/2010/06/Wakota-Bridge-project-Minn.-LURA-300x225.jpg' class='imgtfe' width='70' alt='Image with no title' /></a><a href='http://www.betterroads.com/lura-offers-screed-system-as-free-trial-to-dots/'><img src='http://betterroads.randallreillycms.com/files/2010/06/Wakota-Bridge-project-Minn.-LURA-300x225.jpg' class='imgtfe' width=100 alt='Image with no title' /></a><img src='http://betterroads.randallreillycms.com/files/2010/06/Wakota-Bridge-project-Minn.-LURA-300x225.jpg' class='imgtfe' width=170 alt='Image with no title' />Lura Enterprises, manufacturer of The Lightning Strike Concrete Screed System is offering DOT bridge and road maintenance crews the opportunity to try out its screed system for two weeks.
For the cost of shipping – about $500 – participants will receive the Lightning Strike system, including a 14-foot tube and motor, as a trial.
Lura says there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lura Enterprises, manufacturer of The Lightning Strike Concrete Screed System is offering DOT bridge and road maintenance crews the opportunity to try out its screed system for two weeks.</p>
<p>For the cost of shipping – about $500 – participants will receive the Lightning Strike system, including a 14-foot tube and motor, as a trial.</p>
<p>Lura says there is no obligation to buy &#8212; &#8220;just the opportunity to experience how the Lightning Strike system will increase productivity and efficiency on the jobsite,&#8221; the company says.</p>
<p>For additional details on Lura Enterprises, the Lightning Strike Scre<a target="_blank" href="http://betterroads.randallreillycms.com/files/2010/06/Wakota-Bridge-project-Minn.-LURA.jpg"  rel="shadowbox[post-7679];player=img;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-7680 alignright" title="Wakota Bridge project in Minnesota using the Lura Lightning Screed System" src="http://betterroads.randallreillycms.com/files/2010/06/Wakota-Bridge-project-Minn.-LURA-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>ed system or this offer, visit the company website at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.luraconcretescreed.com" ><em>www.luraconcretescreed.com</em> </a>or call 701-281-8989.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/lura-offers-screed-system-as-free-trial-to-dots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARTBA: Senate climate bill &#8216;shorts&#8217; transportation sector</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/artba-senate-climate-bill-shorts-transportation-sector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/artba-senate-climate-bill-shorts-transportation-sector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Barbaccia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Power Act (APA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike paths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climage change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highway and public transportation network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highway Trust Fund (HTF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedestrian routes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Ruane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation infrastructure investments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3.8699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A majority of the revenue generated from a new transportation user fee included in a climate bill proposed in the U.S. Senate would be diverted to non-transportation purposes —- a departure from 54 years of federal policy, according to the American Road &#38; Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA).
The “American Power Act” (APA), released May 12, would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A majority of the revenue generated from a new transportation user fee included in a climate bill proposed in the U.S. Senate would be diverted to non-transportation purposes —- a departure from 54 years of federal policy, according to the American Road &amp; Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA).</p>
<p>The “American Power Act” (APA), released May 12, would mandate that oil companies producing transportation fuels purchase emissions allowances based on their volume of carbon production. These costs would be passed on to consumers. Transportation user fees are historically dedicated to the maintenance and improvement of the U.S. transportation system — roads, bridges, transit systems, bike paths, pedestrian routes, and related programs.</p>
<p>ARTBA estimates the new fee would generate roughly $20 billion each year from the on-road transportation sector but only return a maximum of $6.25 billion to transportation infrastructure investments, with a cap of $2.5 billion per year contributed to the federal Highway Trust Fund. The majority of transportation-generated revenue, however, would be used for a variety of non-transportation purposes, including federal government debt reduction; discounts for certain heating oil and electricity consumers; reforestation programs; subsidies for the energy production industry; and incentives for nuclear power.</p>
<p>“The U.S. transportation infrastructure network is in desperate need of maintenance and expansion across all modes,&#8221; said Pete Ruane, president &amp; CEO of ARTBA, in a press statement. &#8220;Diverting transportation revenues away from our roads, bridges and transit systems at a time when they need attention the most will hurt our economy, inhibit our ability to reduce emissions from congestion, and limit our ability to compete in a global marketplace.”</p>
<p>ARTBA says it is working to ensure all revenue generated from transportation system use, as part of a climate change bill, is dedicated to improving the nation’s highway and public transportation network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/artba-senate-climate-bill-shorts-transportation-sector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Granite Construction joint venture team competing for projects in Guam</title>
		<link>http://www.betterroads.com/granite-construction-joint-venture-team-competing-for-projects-in-guam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterroads.com/granite-construction-joint-venture-team-competing-for-projects-in-guam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Barbaccia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Granite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Granite Construction Incorporated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hensel Phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple award construction contract (MACC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[runways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traylor Brothers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterroads.randallreillycms.com/?p=7276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granite Construction Incorporated announced today that the joint-venture team composed of Granite, Hensel Phelps and Traylor Brothers is among seven teams of contractors awarded a $4 billion multiple award construction contract (MACC) by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), Pacific. All work on this MACC will be performed within the NAVFAC Pacific area of responsibility, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granite Construction Incorporated announced today that the joint-venture team composed of Granite, Hensel Phelps and Traylor Brothers is among seven teams of contractors awarded a $4 billion multiple award construction contract (MACC) by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), Pacific. All work on this MACC will be performed within the NAVFAC Pacific area of responsibility, which includes Guam, Hawaii, Diego Garcia, and other areas in the Pacific and Indian Oceans.</p>
<p>Scope of the work includes new construction and rehabilitation of roads, bridges, runways, and additional naval facilities, such as barracks, dormitories and medical buildings. Work will be issued as task orders and will allow each of the seven contractors chosen by the NAVFAC to compete under the terms and conditions of the MACC.</p>
<p>The duration of the MACC is not to exceed 60 months and is estimated to be complete by May 2015.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterroads.com/granite-construction-joint-venture-team-competing-for-projects-in-guam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

