Shuster, Boxer say highway bill is about jobs
Amanda Bayhi | March 2, 2014
Rep Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), both chair of their respective chamber’s transportation committee, on Thursday each reiterated President Obama’s message that the new highway bill is about job creation and retention, according to our sister site, Commercial Carrier Journal.
Speaking to attendees at the 2014 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Washington Briefing, Shuster and Boxer both noted that the new highway funding bill is important to jobs and U.S. competitiveness.
“Any time I look at a transportation-infrastructure bill, it’s a jobs bill to me,” Shuster said.. “I’m talking about…the jobs that keep our manufacturers competitive in a world economy. Making sure products getting to our stores that American citizens are buying are getting there as efficiently as possible so they don’t spend more money on them — they can put that money in their pocket and invest it in other things.”
Boxer noted the importance of implementing a new bill before the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) runs out. She said the current bill, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), saved about 3 million jobs, but a failure to act on a new bill before August could result in a loss of 1.8 million jobs.
“What else do we do that creates so many jobs in our states?” Boxer asked. “Very little, frankly. [Highway funding is] about way of life. It’s about our good jobs. It’s about our healthy businesses, and it’s about moving us forward.”
Shuster and Boxer also warned that the nation is losing it’s footing as a top competitor in the international market — a point that Transportation Secretary Foxx also noted in his message at the conference on Thursday.
Shuster said countries such as Brazil and China are growing and gaining a competitive edge by investing in infrastructure.
Boxer encouraged attendees to take action by showing their members of Congress how a transportation bill — or lack thereof — could impact transportation projects. She urged attendees to send a list of projects that would go forward with a new bill and another list of projects that would not get done if Congress fails to act. She added that is important for attendees to see their members of Congress face-to-face
Boxer noted that her committee has begun work on the next bill and said “it’s going well.”
Shuster said the two highway bills proposed this week — one by President Obama and another by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.) — “are encouraging.”
“The American people need to hear these things to know we have to figure out how to do this, to make these investments to keep our country competitive,” Shuster said.
Boxer said the HTF shortfall is a problem that won’t go away, and Congress needs to resolve it with a long-term solution. She added that the gas tax may no longer be the appropriate option, adding that a gas tax hike may not have enough supporters.
She pointed to President Obama’s proposal, noting that it his plan to use tax reform for transportation funding is viable but may not have enough backing. Another option, Boxer noted, could be a tax on vehicle miles traveled (VMT); however, Congress would have to find a way to implement it without using a black box to track vehicles.
Despite roadblocks, Boxer said she is confident that the next highway bill will be a five- or six-year bill, rather than a two-year bill similar to MAP-21.
“We have to work with realities: We’re not going to cut education. We’re not going to repeal the Affordable Care Act,” Boxer said. “So let’s be pragmatic. Let’s not engage in ideological squabbles about how to pay for it: Let’s just find a way.”
MORE FROM News & Analysis
- Report: Just 6 Percent of 2013 federal-aid funding went into new roads & bridges392 Views
- 2014 Better Roads Bridge Inventory341 Views
- One killed, four injured after bridge collapses at college327 Views
- Highway Trust Fund: Who’s in and who’s out in next Congress234 Views
- Tracked electric vehicles the future of transportation?193 Views